Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Slavia Praha W - Slovan Liberec W | 4 - 0 | W |
| 06.09.2026 | Sparta Praha W - Slavia Praha W | 1 - 2 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | Slavia Praha W - Horní Heršpice W | 9 - 0 | W |
| 22.08.2026 | Baník Ostrava W - Slavia Praha W | 0 - 6 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Slavia Praha W - Viktoria Plzeň W | 8 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Odense Q - Brøndby | 0 - 4 | W |
| 08.09.2026 | KoldingQ - Brøndby | 0 - 5 | W |
| 02.09.2026 | Brøndby - Spartak Subotica | 4 - 1 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | Brøndby - FC Copenhagen W | 1 - 3 | L |
| 26.08.2026 | Spartak Subotica - Brøndby | 0 - 5 | W |
The upcoming match between Slavia Praha W and Brøndby is scheduled for 08.08.2026 18:30 in UEFA Champions League Women. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Slavia Praha W recorded 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLWWWWLWW. The averages are 3.20 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Brøndby recorded 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDWDWWWWW. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Slavia Praha W and Brøndby ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.