Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.06.2026 | El Salvador W - Costa Rica W | 1 : 1 |
| 29.10.2025 | El Salvador W - Costa Rica W | 0 : 1 |
| 26.02.2024 | El Salvador W - Costa Rica W | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02.08.2026 | Costa Rica W - El Salvador W | 0 - 1 | L |
| 31.07.2026 | Dominican Republic W - Costa Rica W | 1 - 2 | W |
| 10.06.2026 | Costa Rica W - Canada W | 0 - 6 | L |
| 06.06.2026 | El Salvador W - Costa Rica W | 1 - 1 | D |
| 19.04.2026 | Costa Rica W - Guatemala W | 3 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05.08.2026 | Mexico W - El Salvador W | 4 - 1 | L |
| 02.08.2026 | Costa Rica W - El Salvador W | 0 - 1 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Venezuela W - El Salvador W | 2 - 0 | L |
| 09.06.2026 | Guatemala W - El Salvador W | 1 - 5 | W |
| 06.06.2026 | El Salvador W - Costa Rica W | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Costa Rica W and El Salvador W is scheduled for 02.08.2026 23:00. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Costa Rica W recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLDWWLWLDL. The averages are 3.40 goals scored and 2.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. El Salvador W recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDWWWWLWL. The averages are 2 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Costa Rica W recorded 2 wins, there were 1 draws, and El Salvador W recorded 0 wins. The average total was 1.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 33.3% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Under 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as draw or El Salvador W (X2) with 81% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 18.79%, 22.88% and 58.33%. The model momentum difference is 39.54 points in favour of El Salvador W. The input data quality score is 90/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.12 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -9.04%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
3 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 2). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.23, score 84/100, 83.56% bucket win rate across 73 observations). Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.78).
The match between Costa Rica W and El Salvador W ended 0-1. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 1.67 goals, while this match produced 1. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Under 2.5. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.23. The actual market outcome was Under 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.78. The actual market outcome was BTTS No. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.