Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | Famalicao - Sporting CP | 1 - 1 | D |
| 05.09.2026 | Estrela - Famalicao | 2 - 2 | D |
| 30.08.2026 | Famalicao - GIL Vicente | 0 - 0 | D |
| 23.08.2026 | Santa Clara - Famalicao | 1 - 0 | L |
| 16.08.2026 | Famalicao - Maritimo | 1 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.09.2026 | Como - Parma | 2 - 1 | W |
| 10.09.2026 | Como - RB Leipzig | 4 - 1 | W |
| 04.09.2026 | Genoa - Como | 1 - 4 | W |
| 30.08.2026 | Napoli - Como | 1 - 2 | W |
| 22.08.2026 | Udinese - Como | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Famalicao and Como is scheduled for 31.07.2026 16:00. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Famalicao recorded 5 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDDWWWDDWD. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Como recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWDWLLLDW. The averages are 1.90 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 goals — 40%; Over 2.5 goals — 40%; Over 3.5 goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.22, score 79/100, 79.09% bucket win rate across 220 observations).
The match between Famalicao and Como ended 2-3. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 4 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.22. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 1 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.