Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 21.02.2026 | Al Khaleej Saihat - NEOM | 0 : 1 |
| 24.10.2025 | NEOM - Al Khaleej Saihat | 1 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | NEOM - Al-Fateh | 4 - 2 | W |
| 07.09.2026 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC - NEOM | 0 - 2 | W |
| 03.09.2026 | NEOM - Al Khaleej Saihat | 3 - 0 | W |
| 28.08.2026 | Al Riyadh - NEOM | 1 - 0 | L |
| 24.08.2026 | NEOM - Al-Qadisiyah FC | 0 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Al Khaleej Saihat - Al-Nassr | 1 - 1 | D |
| 07.09.2026 | Al Khaleej Saihat - Al Riyadh | 0 - 0 | D |
| 03.09.2026 | NEOM - Al Khaleej Saihat | 3 - 0 | L |
| 28.08.2026 | Al Khaleej Saihat - Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 1 - 5 | L |
| 25.08.2026 | Abha - Al Khaleej Saihat | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between NEOM and Al Khaleej Saihat is scheduled for 03.09.2026 16:30 in Pro League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
NEOM are in position 8 with 6 points. The stored form sequence is LLWW. Al Khaleej Saihat are in position 14 with 3 points. The stored form sequence is LDDD.
NEOM recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWWWWDDL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al Khaleej Saihat recorded 0 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDLDDLLLL. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 2 head-to-head matches, NEOM recorded 1 wins, there were 1 draws, and Al Khaleej Saihat recorded 0 wins. The average total was 1.50 goals per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair NEOM 0 / Al Khaleej Saihat 0 supports NEOM by an average 1.18 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.25, score 78/100, 77.87% bucket win rate across 479 observations). At least one goal in the match (quota 12, score 77/100, 77.48% group success rate across 1350 observations).
The discipline profile for NEOM at home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 0.50 yellow cards, 0.50 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 50.0%. Season card data is available for 4 of 4 completed matches (100.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Al Khaleej Saihat away from home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 50.0%, 50.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 4 of 4 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between NEOM and Al Khaleej Saihat ended 3-0. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for NEOM at home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 0.5 yellow cards, 0.5 red cards and 1 total cards per match. In this game, NEOM received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 1 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 50%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Al Khaleej Saihat away from home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Al Khaleej Saihat received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. The total was effectively equal to the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 50% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported NEOM at 0. The stored market movement was 1.18 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 3-0, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.25. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 12. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.