Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 14.02.2026 | Chertsey Town - Gloucester City | 2 : 2 |
| 22.11.2025 | Gloucester City - Chertsey Town | 2 : 0 |
| 12.04.2025 | Chertsey Town - Gloucester City | 1 : 0 |
| 14.12.2024 | Gloucester City - Chertsey Town | 3 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Gloucester City - Basingstoke Town | 1 - 1 | D |
| 08.09.2026 | Mangotsfield United - Gloucester City | 0 - 4 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Gloucester City - Mangotsfield United | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.08.2026 | Gloucester City - Evesham United | 1 - 2 | L |
| 29.08.2026 | Havant & Wville - Gloucester City | 3 - 3 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Chertsey Town - Malvern Town | 5 - 0 | W |
| 07.09.2026 | Carshalton Athletic - Chertsey Town | 1 - 2 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Chertsey Town - Carshalton Athletic | 1 - 1 | D |
| 31.08.2026 | Hanworth Villa - Chertsey Town | 4 - 1 | L |
| 29.08.2026 | Chertsey Town - Frome Town | 1 - 2 | L |
The upcoming match between Gloucester City and Chertsey Town is scheduled for 08.08.2026 14:00 in Non League Premier - Southern South. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Gloucester City recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWWLWLWW. The averages are 1.90 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Chertsey Town recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWLLWDLW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 4 head-to-head matches, Gloucester City recorded 2 wins, there were 1 draws, and Chertsey Town recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.75 goals per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Gloucester City 0 / Chertsey Town 0 supports Gloucester City by an average 4.15 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Pinnacle, 1xBet) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 12.50, score 90/100, 90.20% group success rate across 51 observations).
The match between Gloucester City and Chertsey Town ended 0-1. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 4 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.75 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Gloucester City at 0. The stored market movement was 4.15 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 0-1, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 12.5. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 7 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.