Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 13.05.2026 | Naestved - HIK | 1 : 2 |
| 01.05.2026 | HIK - Naestved | 1 : 2 |
| 06.04.2026 | Naestved - HIK | 2 : 1 |
| 08.08.2025 | HIK - Naestved | 2 : 1 |
| 28.02.2025 | HIK - Naestved | 3 : 0 |
| 25.10.2024 | HIK - Naestved | 1 : 0 |
| 25.08.2024 | Naestved - HIK | 0 : 3 |
| 20.03.2022 | Naestved - HIK | 4 : 3 |
| 21.08.2021 | HIK - Naestved | 2 : 2 |
| 14.05.2021 | HIK - Naestved | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | Naestved - Thisted FC | 3 - 1 | W |
| 04.09.2026 | B 93 - Naestved | 1 - 1 | D |
| 30.08.2026 | Skive - Naestved | 1 - 2 | W |
| 23.08.2026 | Naestved - VSK Århus | 0 - 2 | L |
| 18.08.2026 | Nykobing FC - Naestved | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.09.2026 | HIK - Esbjerg | 0 - 5 | L |
| 11.09.2026 | Fremad Amager - HIK | 2 - 1 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | HIK - Brabrand | 2 - 1 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | HIK - Middelfart | 1 - 2 | L |
| 25.08.2026 | NB Bornholm - HIK | 1 - 4 | W |
The upcoming match between Naestved and HIK is scheduled for 09.08.2026 11:00 in 2. Division. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Naestved recorded 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDDDWWLWLW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. HIK recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLDLDLWLLW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 2.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Naestved recorded 2 wins, there were 2 draws, and HIK recorded 6 wins. The average total was 2.80 goals per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Both teams to score — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Over 3.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Naestved to win with 62% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 62.32%, 21.37% and 16.32%. The model momentum difference is 46.00 points in favour of Naestved. The input data quality score is 94/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.44 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.26%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Naestved +0.25 / HIK -0.25 supports Naestved by an average 1.25 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 76/100, 76.29% bucket win rate across 367 observations).
The match between Naestved and HIK ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.8 goals, while this match produced 2. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Naestved at +0.25. The stored market movement was 1.25 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-1, the line settled as a half win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.