Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10.03.2026 | Crusaders FC - Cliftonville FC | 0 : 1 |
| 21.02.2026 | Cliftonville FC - Crusaders FC | 5 : 2 |
| 26.12.2025 | Cliftonville FC - Crusaders FC | 1 : 2 |
| 01.03.2025 | Crusaders FC - Cliftonville FC | 1 : 2 |
| 26.12.2024 | Crusaders FC - Cliftonville FC | 2 : 0 |
| 01.11.2024 | Cliftonville FC - Crusaders FC | 1 : 0 |
| 24.08.2024 | Crusaders FC - Cliftonville FC | 1 : 1 |
| 16.04.2024 | Crusaders FC - Cliftonville FC | 2 : 1 |
| 26.12.2023 | Cliftonville FC - Crusaders FC | 2 : 1 |
| 25.11.2023 | Cliftonville FC - Crusaders FC | 3 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Carrick Rangers - Cliftonville FC | 1 - 3 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Cliftonville FC - Portadown | 3 - 1 | W |
| 29.08.2026 | Cliftonville FC - Dungannon Swifts | 0 - 2 | L |
| 21.08.2026 | Linfield - Cliftonville FC | 1 - 0 | L |
| 15.08.2026 | Bangor - Cliftonville FC | 0 - 3 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Crusaders FC - Limavady United | 1 - 2 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | Coleraine FC - Crusaders FC | 4 - 1 | L |
| 29.08.2026 | Glentoran - Crusaders FC | 1 - 2 | W |
| 22.08.2026 | Crusaders FC - Portadown | 3 - 2 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Crusaders FC - Ballymena United | 2 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Cliftonville FC and Crusaders FC is scheduled for 07.08.2026 18:45 in Premiership. The listed venue is Solitude, Belfast. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Cliftonville FC recorded 6 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWWLLWWL. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Crusaders FC recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDLWDWWLWW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Cliftonville FC recorded 6 wins, there were 1 draws, and Crusaders FC recorded 3 wins. The average total was 2.80 goals per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Cliftonville FC to win with 61% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 61.06%, 20.87% and 18.07%. The model momentum difference is 42.98 points in favour of Cliftonville FC. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.48 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -9.64%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Cliftonville FC -1.5 / Crusaders FC +1.5 supports Cliftonville FC by an average 1.28 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 19, score 82/100, 81.78% group success rate across 1257 observations).
The match between Cliftonville FC and Crusaders FC ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.8 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Cliftonville FC at -1.5. The stored market movement was 1.28 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 2-1, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 19. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 7 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.