Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 21.11.2025 | Triglav - Bilje | 10 : 1 |
| 09.08.2025 | Bilje - Triglav | 0 : 1 |
| 27.04.2025 | Triglav - Bilje | 7 : 4 |
| 12.10.2024 | Bilje - Triglav | 0 : 4 |
| 07.04.2024 | Triglav - Bilje | 2 : 0 |
| 21.09.2023 | Bilje - Triglav | 1 : 1 |
| 13.11.2022 | Triglav - Bilje | 0 : 1 |
| 31.07.2022 | Bilje - Triglav | 2 : 0 |
| 04.05.2022 | Bilje - Triglav | 0 : 0 |
| 15.10.2021 | Triglav - Bilje | 3 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.11.2026 | Triglav - Bilje | 4 - 2 | W |
| 06.11.2026 | Ilirija - Triglav | 1 - 4 | W |
| 02.11.2026 | Triglav - Krka | 2 - 4 | L |
| 28.10.2026 | Beltinci - Triglav | 3 - 4 | W |
| 23.10.2026 | Triglav - Nafta | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.11.2026 | Triglav - Bilje | 4 - 2 | L |
| 07.11.2026 | Bilje - Dren Vrhnika | 3 - 0 | W |
| 31.10.2026 | Bilje - Tabor Sežana | 3 - 2 | W |
| 27.10.2026 | Ilirija - Bilje | 3 - 0 | L |
| 23.10.2026 | Bistrica - Bilje | 4 - 3 | L |
The upcoming match between Triglav and Bilje is scheduled for 13.11.2026 16:30 in 2. SNL. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Triglav are in position 3 with 31 points after 14 matches. The season record is 10 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 31 scored and 13 conceded. The stored form sequence is WLWWW. Bilje are in position 4 with 24 points after 14 matches. The season record is 8 wins, 0 draws and 6 losses. The goals record is 26 scored and 27 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWLWL.
Triglav recorded 7 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWDWWWDWW. The averages are 2.60 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Bilje recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWLLWLWLLW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 2.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Triglav recorded 6 wins, there were 2 draws, and Bilje recorded 2 wins. The average total was 3.70 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Triglav to win with 71% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 70.62%, 18.08% and 11.30%. The model momentum difference is 59.32 points in favour of Triglav. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.28 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -9.60%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Triglav 0 / Bilje 0 supports Bilje by an average 1.73 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Triglav and Bilje ended 4-2. The game produced 6 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.7 goals, while this match produced 6. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Bilje at 0. The stored market movement was 1.73 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 4-2, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.