Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 07.08.2026 | Chicago Fire - Necaxa | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.09.2026 | Chicago Fire - New England Revolution | 1 - 2 | L |
| 10.09.2026 | Chicago Fire - Inter Miami | 1 - 1 | D |
| 05.09.2026 | Toronto FC - Chicago Fire | 4 - 4 | D |
| 29.08.2026 | Seattle Sounders - Chicago Fire | 2 - 2 | D |
| 26.08.2026 | Monterrey - Chicago Fire | 2 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Necaxa - Puebla | 0 - 1 | L |
| 06.09.2026 | Tigres UANL - Necaxa | 1 - 1 | D |
| 29.08.2026 | Necaxa - Cruz Azul | 1 - 3 | L |
| 24.08.2026 | U.N.A.M. - Pumas - Necaxa | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.08.2026 | Necaxa - Leon | 1 - 2 | L |
The upcoming match between Chicago Fire and Necaxa is scheduled for 07.08.2026 00:30 in Leagues Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Chicago Fire recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLLWWWLLLW. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals. Necaxa recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWDWWLDWW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Chicago Fire or draw (1X) with 83% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 59.60%, 23.39% and 17.01%. The model momentum difference is 42.58 points in favour of Chicago Fire. The input data quality score is 100/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.14 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -5.39%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Chicago Fire -0.75 / Necaxa +0.75 supports Chicago Fire by an average 1.35 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Chicago Fire and Necaxa ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Chicago Fire at -0.75. The stored market movement was 1.35 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 2-0, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.